Comments for Get Savvy about PLM http://plmsavvy.org Product Lifecycle Management without the vendor hype Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:57:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ Comment on Time for me to get off the fence – and why… by Yoann Maingon http://plmsavvy.org/2010/11/29/time-for-me-to-get-off-the-fence-and-why/#comment-889 Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:57:00 +0000 http://plmsavvy.org/?p=87#comment-889 Hi Laila,

Have fun @ PTC, It was nice to meet you @ ACE2010.
I’ll stay some more long minutes on your blog, as i give a speech about PLM this week in a school. So I’ll watch again your speech in Oregon !

Best,

Yoann

]]> Comment on Time for me to get off the fence – and why… by Tom Gill http://plmsavvy.org/2010/11/29/time-for-me-to-get-off-the-fence-and-why/#comment-882 Thu, 02 Dec 2010 23:30:21 +0000 http://plmsavvy.org/?p=87#comment-882 Congratulations on the new position. I’m looking forward to more posts!

Best Regards

Tom

]]> Comment on Quality Management Systems (QMS), Document Management (DMS) or PLM? What are the differences? by Chuck Reynolds http://plmsavvy.org/2010/05/17/quality-management-systems-qms-document-management-dms-or-plm-what-are-the-differences/#comment-868 Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:12:55 +0000 http://plmsavvy.org/?p=26#comment-868 Hi Laila – Interesting read on PLM. Have you any experience with Test Lifecycle Management (TLM)?

Regards,
Chuck

]]> Comment on The importance of a long term roadmap for PLM by Laila Hirr http://plmsavvy.org/2008/07/11/the-importance-of-a-long-term-roadmap-for-plm/#comment-782 Fri, 11 Jun 2010 21:40:20 +0000 http://plmsavvy.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-782 Ian, you’ve touched on something that most people haven’t even begun to think about in the context of PLM. Disposal. HUGE issue as more and more of the regulations are pushing for reporting and management of product disposability in the whole push for green. If you don’t have PLM you won’t be able to address this, and also you have to thing about planning for managing disposal information as your system is designed.

]]> Comment on The importance of a long term roadmap for PLM by Ian @ Document management http://plmsavvy.org/2008/07/11/the-importance-of-a-long-term-roadmap-for-plm/#comment-773 Tue, 18 May 2010 12:01:59 +0000 http://plmsavvy.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-773 I don’t think you should have PLM without a roadmap. We should remember that PLM goes right through from design and manufacture, to service and disposal. Without that roadmap I fear disposal may be neglected, something we could regret in years to come.

]]> Comment on Fundamentals of PLM Seminar Video by Samantha http://plmsavvy.org/2009/11/18/fundamentals-of-plm-seminar-video/#comment-745 Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:26:58 +0000 http://plmsavvy.org/?p=80#comment-745 Thanks for sharing! I just finished watching the seminar online and it’s really thorough.
I hope you’ll be back online and blogging again soon!

Samantha
Datastay Corp.

]]> Comment on Fundamentals of PLM Seminar Video by jiting http://plmsavvy.org/2009/11/18/fundamentals-of-plm-seminar-video/#comment-711 Thu, 07 Jan 2010 06:24:21 +0000 http://plmsavvy.org/?p=80#comment-711 The seminar was really amazing. We learned a lot of PLM knowledge. Thank you very much! Happy new year to you!

]]> Comment on The Part Numbering Conundrum by Steve http://plmsavvy.org/2007/04/04/the-part-numbering-conundrum/#comment-690 Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:44:26 +0000 http://plmsavvy.org/2007/04/04/the-part-numbering-conundrum/#comment-690 Like many others, we ran into the same problem in trying to decide on using significant or non-significant part numbers. There are pros and cons to each, and as a very small business we were more worried about what was happening today. While we didn’t want to paint ourselves into a corner ten years from now when/if we got to be a big company, we finally decided that was our biggest concern.

We finally ended up deciding on the part numbering service from part-numbering.com (http://www.part-numbering.com). It let us set up our significant numbering formats with a shared sequence across all of our number formats. Our hope is that when we get big, or the “significant” format becomes to much burden to support, we can just switch over to a non-significant format. Since all of our part numbers are drawing from the same sequence, they’ll already be unique across all formats. So the conversion should be a snap (we hope).

Cheers,
Steve

]]> Comment on The importance of a long term roadmap for PLM by Matt http://plmsavvy.org/2008/07/11/the-importance-of-a-long-term-roadmap-for-plm/#comment-676 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:48:23 +0000 http://plmsavvy.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-676 Meant to add question mark to above?

]]> Comment on The importance of a long term roadmap for PLM by Matt Brosious http://plmsavvy.org/2008/07/11/the-importance-of-a-long-term-roadmap-for-plm/#comment-675 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:47:29 +0000 http://plmsavvy.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-675 Do you think intergated PLM, sourcing and ERP should be part of the roadmap.

]]>