Comments on: The problem with PLM Polls http://plmsavvy.org/2007/07/21/the-problem-with-plm-polls/ Product Lifecycle Management without the vendor hype Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:57:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: plmsavvy http://plmsavvy.org/2007/07/21/the-problem-with-plm-polls/#comment-22 Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:33:47 +0000 http://plmsavvy.org/2007/07/21/the-problem-with-plm-polls/#comment-22 The irony of 3D Mojo’s comments is that my identity and background is clearly stated on the About PLMSavvy page while there is no author information to be found on 3D Mojo.

To be hung up on the .org – is silly to say the least as PLM Savvy does not promote any product or company, thus serves the intent of a .org.

We both agree that the survey I cited is not a scientific survey and comes to faulty conclusions. And that was the point. We also have agreement that hyperbole around PLM “strategy” is not beneficial – that real and tangible metrics and deliverables are key.

]]> By: 3D Mojo » Blog Archive » PLM’s silent majority http://plmsavvy.org/2007/07/21/the-problem-with-plm-polls/#comment-21 Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:15:26 +0000 http://plmsavvy.org/2007/07/21/the-problem-with-plm-polls/#comment-21 [...] reading the PLM-oriented blog at http://www.plmsavvy.org/ (it’s not really a .org) and ran across this post about a CIMdata PLM [...]

]]>